HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings)
Queries and documents speak different languages. HyDE bridges the gap by generating a hypothetical answer first, embedding it, and using that embedding to find real documents — dramatically improving retrieval accuracy without any fine-tuning or labeled data.
Introduced: HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings) was published in 2022 by Gao et al. The technique addresses a fundamental problem in information retrieval: queries and documents are written in very different styles. A user asks “How do I fix a memory leak in Python?” but the relevant document discusses “garbage collection strategies, reference counting, and the gc module.” Embedding the query directly often misses the best documents. HyDE solves this by using an LLM to generate a hypothetical document that would answer the query, then embedding that hypothetical document instead of the raw query. The embedding of a document-style text naturally aligns better with actual document embeddings in vector space.
Modern LLM Status: HyDE has become a foundational technique in modern RAG pipelines. The insight — that generating a hypothetical answer creates better embeddings for retrieval than the raw query — is now widely adopted in production search and retrieval systems in 2026. Many enterprise RAG implementations use HyDE or HyDE-inspired query expansion as a standard preprocessing step. The technique pairs naturally with modern embedding models and vector databases, and has been extended into multi-hypothesis variants that generate several hypothetical documents for broader retrieval coverage.
Answer the Question to Find the Answer
Traditional search embeds the query and looks for similar document embeddings. But queries are short, informal, and question-shaped. Documents are long, detailed, and statement-shaped. This mismatch — called the query-document gap — means the best document for a query might sit far away in embedding space, even though its content is exactly what the user needs.
HyDE flips the retrieval strategy. Instead of searching with the query, ask an LLM to generate a hypothetical document that would answer the query. This hypothetical document is written in the same style, length, and vocabulary as real documents in your corpus. When you embed it, the resulting vector naturally sits close to the real documents that answer the query — because like attracts like in embedding space.
Think of it like asking someone to describe what the perfect search result would look like, then using that description to find the actual result. The hypothetical answer doesn’t need to be factually correct — it just needs to be stylistically similar to the right document so the embedding captures the right semantic neighborhood.
Embedding models map text into vector space based on semantic meaning and document structure. A short query like “memory leak fix” produces a sparse, ambiguous embedding. But a hypothetical paragraph discussing “identifying memory leaks in Python using tracemalloc, resolving circular references, and configuring the garbage collector” produces a rich, specific embedding that occupies the same semantic region as real technical documentation. The embedding doesn’t care whether the hypothetical document is factually accurate — it cares about semantic proximity to real answers.
The HyDE Process
Four stages from query to improved retrieval
Receive the User Query
Start with the natural language query the user wants to search for. This is the raw question that, if embedded directly, would produce a suboptimal retrieval vector due to the query-document style gap.
“What are the best practices for securing a REST API in production?”
Generate a Hypothetical Document
Prompt an LLM to generate a document that would answer the query. The generated text should resemble the style and depth of documents in your corpus — a technical article, a documentation page, an academic paper paragraph, depending on what you are searching over. Factual accuracy is secondary to stylistic alignment.
Hypothetical document: “REST API Security Best Practices: Securing a production REST API requires a layered approach. Implement OAuth 2.0 or JWT-based authentication for all endpoints. Use HTTPS exclusively and enforce TLS 1.2+. Apply rate limiting to prevent abuse and DDoS attacks. Validate and sanitize all input parameters to prevent injection attacks. Implement CORS policies to restrict cross-origin access. Use API keys for service-to-service communication and rotate them regularly. Enable audit logging for all API calls and monitor for anomalous patterns...”
Embed the Hypothetical Document
Pass the hypothetical document through your embedding model to produce a dense vector representation. This vector now captures the semantic characteristics of a document-style answer rather than a question-style query, placing it closer to relevant real documents in the vector space.
The hypothetical document is embedded into a 768-dimensional vector that sits in the same semantic region as real security documentation, API reference guides, and DevOps best practice articles in your knowledge base.
Retrieve Real Documents via Similarity Search
Use the hypothetical document’s embedding to perform similarity search against your document corpus. The retrieved documents are real, verified content — the hypothetical document served only as a search probe. Always present the retrieved real documents to users, not the hypothetical generation.
The search returns actual documentation about REST API security from your knowledge base — OWASP API Security Top 10 guidelines, your organization’s internal security standards, and production deployment checklists. These real documents are then used to generate a verified, grounded answer.
See the Difference
Why hypothetical documents retrieve better results than raw queries
Direct Query Embedding
How do I make my machine learning model faster?
1. “Introduction to Machine Learning” (general overview, not about optimization)
2. “Faster R-CNN Architecture” (matches “faster” but wrong topic)
3. “Speed Training for Athletes” (semantic confusion with “faster”)
HyDE Embedding
Generated: “ML Model Inference Optimization: To improve model inference speed, consider model quantization (INT8/FP16), knowledge distillation to a smaller student model, pruning unused connections, TensorRT or ONNX Runtime compilation, batch inference for throughput, and GPU memory optimization through gradient checkpointing...”
1. “Model Optimization with TensorRT” (directly relevant)
2. “Quantization and Pruning Guide” (core optimization technique)
3. “Inference Performance Benchmarks” (exactly the right domain)
Natural Language Works Too
While structured frameworks and contextual labels are powerful tools, LLMs are exceptionally good at understanding natural language. As long as your prompt contains the actual contextual information needed to create, answer, or deliver the response you’re looking for — the who, what, why, and constraints — the AI can produce complete and accurate results whether you use a formal framework or plain conversational language. But even in 2026, with the best prompts, verifying AI output is always a necessary step.
HyDE in Action
See how hypothetical documents improve retrieval across domains
“Why does my Kubernetes pod keep restarting?”
Generated for embedding (not shown to user): “Troubleshooting Kubernetes Pod Restart Loops: Common causes of CrashLoopBackOff in Kubernetes include application crashes due to unhandled exceptions, OOMKilled events from exceeding memory limits, failed liveness probe checks, missing environment variables or config maps, and image pull errors. To diagnose, check pod logs with kubectl logs, examine events with kubectl describe pod, and review resource limits in the pod spec. Readiness and liveness probes may need adjusted timeout and threshold values...”
Retrieved real documents: Internal runbook “K8s Pod Restart Troubleshooting Guide,” “Memory Limits and OOMKilled Best Practices,” “Configuring Health Probes.” These verified documents are what the user actually sees.
“Can my landlord enter my apartment without notice?”
Generated for embedding: “Landlord Right of Entry and Tenant Privacy: Under most state residential tenancy laws, landlords must provide reasonable advance notice (typically 24–48 hours) before entering a rental unit, except in cases of emergency such as fire, flood, or gas leak. Notice requirements vary by jurisdiction. Some states require written notice specifying the date, time, and purpose of entry. Permitted purposes generally include repairs, inspections, showing the unit to prospective tenants, and agreed-upon maintenance. Unauthorized entry may constitute trespass or harassment under tenant protection statutes...”
Retrieved real documents: State-specific tenant rights statutes, relevant case law summaries, and tenant rights organization guidelines. Always verify legal information with a qualified attorney for your jurisdiction.
“Does sleep affect how well you learn new things?”
Generated for embedding: “Sleep-Dependent Memory Consolidation and Learning: Research demonstrates that sleep plays a critical role in memory consolidation, the process by which newly acquired information is stabilized in long-term memory. During slow-wave sleep (SWS), declarative memories are reactivated and transferred from hippocampal to neocortical stores. REM sleep appears particularly important for procedural and emotional memory consolidation. Sleep deprivation before learning impairs hippocampal encoding capacity, while post-learning sleep enhances retention by 20–40% compared to equivalent wake periods...”
Retrieved real documents: Peer-reviewed studies on sleep-dependent memory consolidation, sleep architecture and learning reviews, and meta-analyses of sleep restriction effects on cognitive performance. Verify specific percentages and claims against the retrieved primary sources.
When to Use HyDE
Best for retrieval tasks where query-document style gaps hurt accuracy
Perfect For
As a preprocessing step in retrieval-augmented generation, HyDE consistently improves the quality of retrieved documents over raw query embedding.
When you have no labeled query-document pairs for fine-tuning, HyDE provides strong retrieval performance without any task-specific training data.
When users ask questions in natural, casual language but documents are written in formal, technical prose — HyDE bridges the style gap.
When queries arrive in one language but documents exist in another — generating a hypothetical document in the target language can improve multilingual retrieval.
Skip It When
When users search with exact terms, product codes, or identifiers — dense embedding retrieval isn’t needed and HyDE adds unnecessary latency.
HyDE adds an LLM generation step before each search. For real-time autocomplete or high-throughput systems, the latency overhead may be unacceptable.
When you already have fine-tuned embedding models or query expansion systems trained on your domain, HyDE may provide marginal improvement over existing optimization.
Use Cases
Where HyDE delivers the most value
Enterprise Knowledge Search
Employees ask questions in plain language; internal documents are written in formal, domain-specific jargon. HyDE bridges this gap for internal knowledge bases and wikis without requiring query-document training pairs.
Customer Support Chatbots
Users describe problems in their own words; solutions live in structured help articles. HyDE-powered retrieval finds the right documentation regardless of how the question is phrased.
Medical Literature Search
Clinicians ask about patient symptoms in clinical shorthand; research papers use full medical terminology. HyDE generates document-style hypotheses that match journal article language. Always have medical professionals verify retrieved findings.
E-Commerce Product Discovery
Shoppers search with vague descriptions (“something warm for winter hiking”); product listings use specific technical specifications. HyDE generates product-style descriptions for better matching.
Security Threat Intelligence
Analysts query with high-level threat descriptions; intelligence reports use standardized MITRE ATT&CK terminology. HyDE aligns analyst language with structured threat databases.
Code Search and Documentation
Developers describe what they want code to do; existing code uses specific function names and patterns. HyDE generates code-style hypothetical implementations for semantic code search across large repositories.
Where HyDE Fits
HyDE sits at the intersection of generation and retrieval
HyDE is not a replacement for RAG — it is an enhancement to the retrieval step within a RAG pipeline. Use HyDE to improve what documents get retrieved, then use standard RAG practices (contextual grounding, citation tracking, answer verification) to generate the final response. The hypothetical document is a retrieval tool, not an answer. Always present users with information grounded in the real retrieved documents, not the hypothetical generation.
For production systems, consider generating multiple hypothetical documents per query (3–5 variations) and averaging their embeddings. This multi-hypothesis approach captures a broader semantic neighborhood and reduces the risk of a single biased generation skewing retrieval results.
Critical reminder: The hypothetical document may contain factual errors — that is expected and acceptable. Its purpose is semantic alignment, not factual accuracy. Never surface the hypothetical document to end users. Always ground final answers in the real retrieved documents.
Related Techniques
Explore complementary retrieval and knowledge techniques
Upgrade Your Retrieval Pipeline
Learn how HyDE fits into modern RAG architectures or build retrieval-enhanced prompts with our tools.